RAHUL SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/63248/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Nov-2025

CNR: PHHC011790832025

Filing Number

CRM-M/93720/2025

Filing Date

04-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/63248/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Coram

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.17 - REGULAR BAIL PUNJAB (AGNST WOMEN) ( 286 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL SINGH

    Adv. KARANDEEP S. SIDHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Alok JainView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/63248/2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Rahul Singh, who had been in custody for over 1 year and 5 months on charges including alleged sexual assault under BNS 2023 and the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956. Justice Alok Jain found that all material witnesses had been examined, the Medical Legal Report recorded no injuries on the victim, and prolonged custody served no purpose given the trial's expected duration. Bail was approved subject to conditions including biometric attendance every 15 days, non-travel abroad without permission, and continued availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/63248/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/63248/2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Rahul Singh, who had been in custody for over 1 year and 5 months on charges including alleged sexual assault under BNS 2023 and the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956. Justice Alok Jain found that all material witnesses had been examined, the Medical Legal Report recorded no injuries on the victim, and prolonged custody served no purpose given the trial's expected duration. Bail was approved subject to conditions including biometric attendance every 15 days, non-travel abroad without permission, and continued availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case