VIJAY KANSAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/34538/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC011786052024
e-Filing Number
16-12-2024
Filing Number
CWP/74256/2024
Filing Date
17-Dec-2024
Registration No
CWP/34538/2024
Registration Date
18-Dec-2024
Judge
Justice (To Be Nominated) , Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor
Coram
Justice (To Be Nominated) , Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor
Bench Type
Double
Category
97.7 - VIRES (GOVT. SERVICE HARYANA) ( 870 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY KANSAL
Adv. HARSH MEHLA
-
2.Vijay kansal
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
-
2.Vijay kansal
-
3.Director General of Haryana
-
4.Superintendent of Police
-
5.Haryana Staff Selection Commission, through its Secretary
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Justice (To Be Nominated),mr. Justice Rohit KapoorView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/34538/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Vijay Kansal's petition challenging Rule 12.18(3)(b) of the Punjab Police (Haryana Amendment) Rules, 2015, which bars appointment of candidates facing criminal charges involving moral turpitude punishable by three years or more imprisonment. The Court held the Rule reasonable as it provides legitimate guidelines for assessing suitability for police employment, distinguishing between initial appointment eligibility and continuance in service—standards that need not be identical. The petitioner's candidature for Constable was cancelled after charges were framed against him for outraging a woman's modesty under IPC Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, and 354. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Feb-2026
Justice (To Be Nominated),mr. Justice Rohit KapoorView PDF
-
17-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/34538/2024
Case Summary: CWP/34538/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Vijay Kansal's petition challenging Rule 12.18(3)(b) of the Punjab Police (Haryana Amendment) Rules, 2015, which bars appointment of candidates facing criminal charges involving moral turpitude punishable by three years or more imprisonment. The Court held the Rule reasonable as it provides legitimate guidelines for assessing suitability for police employment, distinguishing between initial appointment eligibility and continuance in service—standards that need not be identical. The petitioner's candidature for Constable was cancelled after charges were framed against him for outraging a woman's modesty under IPC Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, and 354. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts