UNION OF INDIA AND ORS vs BALWINDER SINGH AND ANR — CWP/34895/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 226 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Dec-2024

CNR: PHHC011785072024

e-Filing Number

16-12-2024

Filing Number

CWP/74170/2024

Filing Date

17-Dec-2024

Registration No

CWP/34895/2024

Registration Date

19-Dec-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Bench Type

Double

Category

4.11 - ORDERS AGAINST ARMED FORCE TRIBUNAL(CIVIL) ( 328 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

    Adv. ANIL CHAWLA

  2. 2.Balwinder Singh and anr

  3. 3.Armed Force Tribunal

  4. 4.Officer In Charge

  5. 5.The Principal Controller

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALWINDER SINGH AND ANR

  2. 2.Balwinder Singh and anr

  3. 3.Armed Force Tribunal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF

    The High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition challenging an order granting disability pension benefits to respondent Balwinder Singh with disability rounded from 20% to 50%. The court held that pensionary benefits must be paid by the employee's parent department (Army Postal Service), not the deputation department, and since the parent department did not challenge the impugned order, it was acceptable to them, providing no grounds for court interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/34895/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition challenging an order granting disability pension benefits to respondent Balwinder Singh with disability rounded from 20% to 50%. The court held that pensionary benefits must be paid by the employee's parent department (Army Postal Service), not the deputation department, and since the parent department did not challenge the impugned order, it was acceptable to them, providing no grounds for court interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case