SANDEEP AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/62036/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011777222025

Filing Number

CRM-M/92965/2025

Filing Date

03-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/62036/2025

Registration Date

03-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP AND ANOTHER

    Adv. KAMAL CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M/62036/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 655 (registered for robbery under IPC Sections 379A and 34) against petitioners Sandeep and another after finding a genuine, voluntary compromise dated 31.10.2025 between the accused and the complainant. The court determined the offence was not heinous, the settlement was made without coercion, and continuation would waste judicial time without serving public purpose. The petitioners were ordered to deposit Rs. 25,000 each to Red Cross Old Age Home within two months as cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/62036/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M/62036/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 655 (registered for robbery under IPC Sections 379A and 34) against petitioners Sandeep and another after finding a genuine, voluntary compromise dated 31.10.2025 between the accused and the complainant. The court determined the offence was not heinous, the settlement was made without coercion, and continuation would waste judicial time without serving public purpose. The petitioners were ordered to deposit Rs. 25,000 each to Red Cross Old Age Home within two months as cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case