PUNJAB AND SIND BANK vs RAJESH DHIMAN, DC CUM ADDL. DISTT. MAGISTRATE AND ANOTHER — COCP/5413/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011771162025

Filing Number

COCP/69041/2025

Filing Date

01-Nov-2025

Registration No

COCP/5413/2025

Registration Date

01-Nov-2025

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNJAB AND SIND BANK

    Adv. MANJIT SINGH RANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH DHIMAN, DC CUM ADDL. DISTT. MAGISTRATE AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: COCP/5413/2025 The Punjab and Sind Bank's contempt petition against Rajesh Dhiman (DC, Bathinda) was dismissed as the court found the previous mandamus order (dated 18.09.2025) requiring possession of a secured asset had been substantially complied with. The respondents demonstrated compliance when on 06.04.2026, during the takeover process, the creditor settled the dispute by paying Rs. 1 crore to the bank, and the magistrate suspended further possession proceedings following this settlement agreement between both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/5413/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COCP/5413/2025 The Punjab and Sind Bank's contempt petition against Rajesh Dhiman (DC, Bathinda) was dismissed as the court found the previous mandamus order (dated 18.09.2025) requiring possession of a secured asset had been substantially complied with. The respondents demonstrated compliance when on 06.04.2026, during the takeover process, the creditor settled the dispute by paying Rs. 1 crore to the bank, and the magistrate suspended further possession proceedings following this settlement agreement between both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case