GUR SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS — CWP/32130/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011742472025

e-Filing Number

27-10-2025

Filing Number

CWP/67853/2025

Filing Date

28-Oct-2025

Registration No

CWP/32130/2025

Registration Date

29-Oct-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.63 - CASES RELATING TO ALL KINDS OF COMPENSATION ( 756 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUR SINGH AND ORS

    Adv. R S MANHAS

  2. 2.Gur Singh and ors

  3. 3.nand lal

  4. 4.Ajit singh

  5. 5.Darshan singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

  2. 2.State of Punjab and ors

  3. 3.Director, Department Of Agriculture and Farmer Welfare, Punjab

  4. 4.Chief Agriculture Officer

  5. 5.Punjab Agriculture University

  6. 6.Agriculture Extension Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petitioners' plea for direct compensation for crop loss due to defective seeds, holding that it lacks jurisdiction to determine seed defects or quantify damages. The court directed the respondent State authorities to consider the petitioners' compensation claim in accordance with applicable law, as such determinations require specialized administrative expertise rather than court adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/32130/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petitioners' plea for direct compensation for crop loss due to defective seeds, holding that it lacks jurisdiction to determine seed defects or quantify damages. The court directed the respondent State authorities to consider the petitioners' compensation claim in accordance with applicable law, as such determinations require specialized administrative expertise rather than court adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case