YASHPAL PARJAPATI AND ANOTHER vs AJAY KUMAR, IAS, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GURUGRAM — COCP/5324/2025
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011737762025
Filing Number
COCP/67661/2025
Filing Date
28-Oct-2025
Registration No
COCP/5324/2025
Registration Date
28-Oct-2025
Judge
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
Coram
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
Bench Type
Single
Category
34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YASHPAL PARJAPATI AND ANOTHER
Adv. Mukesh Rao
-
2.YASHPAL PARJAPATI
-
3.BANWARI LAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAY KUMAR, IAS, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GURUGRAM
-
2.AJAY KUMAR IAS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURUGRAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur JeewanView PDF
Case Summary: COCP-5324-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petitioners' contempt of court petition against Deputy Commissioner Ajay Kumar for alleged willful disobedience of a prior court order. The court found that the respondent had already examined the matter through competent authority and issued a detailed speaking order dated 21.10.2025 after affording opportunity to all parties, thereby curing the alleged contempt. The petition was disposed of with liberty to petitioners to pursue appropriate alternate remedies and to challenge the 21.10.2025 order if advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. COCP/5324/2025
Case Summary: COCP-5324-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petitioners' contempt of court petition against Deputy Commissioner Ajay Kumar for alleged willful disobedience of a prior court order. The court found that the respondent had already examined the matter through competent authority and issued a detailed speaking order dated 21.10.2025 after affording opportunity to all parties, thereby curing the alleged contempt. The petition was disposed of with liberty to petitioners to pursue appropriate alternate remedies and to challenge the 21.10.2025 order if advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts