JAGDEEP SINGH @ JAGDEEP SINGH SANDHU vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/59499/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011705732025

Filing Number

CRM-M/89182/2025

Filing Date

17-Oct-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/59499/2025

Registration Date

17-Oct-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDEEP SINGH @ JAGDEEP SINGH SANDHU

    Adv. ANKIT BISHNOI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-59499/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Jagdeep Singh Singh Sandhu in an FIR registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), and 61(2) of BNS, 2023, making absolute an interim bail order from October 2025. The court accepted the State's submission that the petitioner had cooperated with investigation and was not required for further custodial interrogation. However, the court clarified that any arrest for additional offences requires prior court approval, following Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/59499/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-59499/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Jagdeep Singh Singh Sandhu in an FIR registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), and 61(2) of BNS, 2023, making absolute an interim bail order from October 2025. The court accepted the State's submission that the petitioner had cooperated with investigation and was not required for further custodial interrogation. However, the court clarified that any arrest for additional offences requires prior court approval, following Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case