SK BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS AND ANOTHER vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — CWP/30531/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Nov-2025

CNR: PHHC011661582025

e-Filing Number

12-10-2025

Filing Number

CWP/64582/2025

Filing Date

13-Oct-2025

Registration No

CWP/30531/2025

Registration Date

13-Oct-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Coram

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

18.14 - ENHANCE & APPORTIONMENT OF COMP ON ACC OF ACQ/REQ ( 451 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS AND ANOTHER

    Adv. RANJIT SAINI

  2. 2.SK Builders and Developers and another

  3. 3.Harvinder Pal Singh Chugh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Union of India and others

  3. 3.Project Director

  4. 4.Sub Divisional Magistrate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition and directed Respondent No.3 to calculate compensation per the CALA's award dated 07.08.2023 within one week, with Respondent No.2 depositing it to CALA within two weeks, and Respondent No.3 releasing it to petitioners within one week thereafter. The court rejected the NHAI's objection that the award was under arbitration challenge, holding that a mere challenge without an interim order cannot restrain compensation disbursement to landowners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/30531/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition and directed Respondent No.3 to calculate compensation per the CALA's award dated 07.08.2023 within one week, with Respondent No.2 depositing it to CALA within two weeks, and Respondent No.3 releasing it to petitioners within one week thereafter. The court rejected the NHAI's objection that the award was under arbitration challenge, holding that a mere challenge without an interim order cannot restrain compensation disbursement to landowners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case