SUMAN LATA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRA-S/3224/2025

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Jan-2026

CNR: PHHC011653352025

Filing Number

CRA-S/86630/2025

Filing Date

09-Oct-2025

Registration No

CRA-S/3224/2025

Registration Date

15-Oct-2025

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

36.48-CRIMINAL APPEALS U/S 14A UNDER SC/ST ACT,1989 SEEKING REGULAR BAILS-GENERAL ( 1424 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMAN LATA

    Adv. R S MAMLI

  2. 2.STAE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STAE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.DEEPAK KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA-S/3224/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Suman Lata's appeal against the lower court's rejection of her pre-arrest bail application in an SC/ST Act case. Lata, a Haryana Police employee, was accused of posting derogatory comments on a YouTube video insulting Scheduled Caste members, allegedly made through objectionable language. The court found a prima facie case against her under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(u) of the SC/ST Act and held that Section 18-A's bar on anticipatory bail in SC/ST cases applied, rejecting her argument that lack of need for custodial interrogation warranted bail. The appeal was dismissed on 24.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-S/3224/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA-S/3224/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Suman Lata's appeal against the lower court's rejection of her pre-arrest bail application in an SC/ST Act case. Lata, a Haryana Police employee, was accused of posting derogatory comments on a YouTube video insulting Scheduled Caste members, allegedly made through objectionable language. The court found a prima facie case against her under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(u) of the SC/ST Act and held that Section 18-A's bar on anticipatory bail in SC/ST cases applied, rejecting her argument that lack of need for custodial interrogation warranted bail. The appeal was dismissed on 24.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case