MALKIAT SINGH AND OTHERS vs BALDEV SINGH AND OTHERS — CR/7136/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011635842024
Filing Number
CR/68581/2024
Filing Date
22-Nov-2024
Registration No
CR/7136/2024
Registration Date
04-Dec-2024
Judge
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
Coram
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
Bench Type
Single
Category
30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MALKIAT SINGH AND OTHERS
Adv. G.S. NAGRA
-
2.MALKIAT SINGH
-
3.AVTAR SINGH
-
4.PRITAM SINGH
-
5.SURJIT SINGH
-
6.BALWINDER KAUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.BALDEV SINGH AND OTHERS
-
2.MALKIAT SINGH
-
3.AVTAR SINGH
-
4.PRITAM SINGH
-
5.SURJIT SINGH
-
6.BALWINDER KAUR
-
7.BALJINDER KAUR
-
8.UNION OF INDIA
-
9.ST OF PB
-
10.COLLECTOR CUM DC
-
11.DEPT OF SALES
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur JeewanView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition seeking to set aside an order that rejected the petitioners' application to be impleaded as parties in Civil Suit No.230/2021. Since the underlying suit had already been dismissed by the trial court on 10.02.2026, the petition became infructuous. The court disposed of the petition for being infructuous and for want of prosecution, as no party appeared despite being called twice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CR/7136/2024
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition seeking to set aside an order that rejected the petitioners' application to be impleaded as parties in Civil Suit No.230/2021. Since the underlying suit had already been dismissed by the trial court on 10.02.2026, the petition became infructuous. The court disposed of the petition for being infructuous and for want of prosecution, as no party appeared despite being called twice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts