GURMEET SINGH ALIAS GURMEET SINGH JHANSAL AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/56345/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011612982025

Filing Number

CRM-M/84308/2025

Filing Date

30-Sep-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/56345/2025

Registration Date

30-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURMEET SINGH ALIAS GURMEET SINGH JHANSAL AND ANOTHER

    Adv. P.K.S. PHOOLKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to two young petitioners (aged 21 and 18) in a criminal case involving charges under BNS 2023 and Arms Act, 1959, finding that neither had been attributed any specific injury to the complainant despite being imprisoned for over 8 months. The court emphasized the slow trial pace with 21 prosecution witnesses yet to be examined and noted the complainant's involvement in multiple other criminal cases, ultimately deeming bail appropriate subject to surety bonds and conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/56345/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to two young petitioners (aged 21 and 18) in a criminal case involving charges under BNS 2023 and Arms Act, 1959, finding that neither had been attributed any specific injury to the complainant despite being imprisoned for over 8 months. The court emphasized the slow trial pace with 21 prosecution witnesses yet to be examined and noted the complainant's involvement in multiple other criminal cases, ultimately deeming bail appropriate subject to surety bonds and conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case