BRIJ BHUSHAN AND OTHERS vs AMAN KUMAR, DISTRICT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, KURUKSHETRA AND ANOTHER — COCP/5196/2025
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10/12. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011604902025
Filing Number
COCP/62558/2025
Filing Date
29-Sep-2025
Registration No
COCP/5196/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Judge
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Coram
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Category
34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRIJ BHUSHAN AND OTHERS
Adv. NISCHAL CHETANYA MANCHANDA
-
2.BRIJ BHUSHAN
-
3.PREM CHAND GARG
-
4.MADAN LAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMAN KUMAR, DISTRICT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, KURUKSHETRA AND ANOTHER
-
2.AMAN KUMAR
-
3.ASHOK KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF
Summary of COCP-5196-2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of a contempt petition filed by Brij Bhushan against the District Municipal Corporation Kurukshetra for non-compliance with prior court orders regarding house tax recovery notices. The court found that the respondents had withdrawn the impugned notices via order dated 07.05.2026, thereby complying with the earlier orders dated 31.01.2014 and 03.10.2013. Consequently, the contempt was purged and the rule was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Feb-2026
Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF
-
29-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. COCP/5196/2025
Summary of COCP-5196-2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of a contempt petition filed by Brij Bhushan against the District Municipal Corporation Kurukshetra for non-compliance with prior court orders regarding house tax recovery notices. The court found that the respondents had withdrawn the impugned notices via order dated 07.05.2026, thereby complying with the earlier orders dated 31.01.2014 and 03.10.2013. Consequently, the contempt was purged and the rule was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts