DALJEET SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/56328/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-Nov-2025

CNR: PHHC011590312025

Filing Number

CRM-M/83065/2025

Filing Date

26-Sep-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/56328/2025

Registration Date

30-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DALJEET SINGH

    Adv. Nikhil Chopra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M/56328/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.55 (dated 16.05.2025) registered against Daljeet Singh under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 304, 352, and 351(2) of BNS, finding the offences were primarily private in nature and that the accused and complainant (Rajwinder Kaur) had entered into a genuine, voluntary compromise on 30.08.2025. The court applied established principles permitting quashing of non-compoundable offences of private character upon verified compromise, noting the complainant's voluntary participation and absence of coercion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/56328/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M/56328/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.55 (dated 16.05.2025) registered against Daljeet Singh under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 304, 352, and 351(2) of BNS, finding the offences were primarily private in nature and that the accused and complainant (Rajwinder Kaur) had entered into a genuine, voluntary compromise on 30.08.2025. The court applied established principles permitting quashing of non-compoundable offences of private character upon verified compromise, noting the complainant's voluntary participation and absence of coercion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case