RAMESH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/57554/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011588522025

Filing Number

CRM-M/82975/2025

Filing Date

26-Sep-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/57554/2025

Registration Date

09-Oct-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH

    Adv. SAHIL CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/57554/2025 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Ramesh, accused of murder (IPC §302, 201, 34) in a case originating from FIR No. 884/2021. The court found that while the prosecution's case rests on circumstantial evidence, Ramesh's right to speedy trial had been significantly compromised—he had been incarcerated for over 4 years with only 13 of 19 prosecution witnesses examined. Justice Bhardwaj emphasized that deprivation of liberty without ensuring timely trial violates Article 21 of the Constitution and held that even serious crimes do not override an accused's constitutional right to speedy trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/57554/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/57554/2025 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Ramesh, accused of murder (IPC §302, 201, 34) in a case originating from FIR No. 884/2021. The court found that while the prosecution's case rests on circumstantial evidence, Ramesh's right to speedy trial had been significantly compromised—he had been incarcerated for over 4 years with only 13 of 19 prosecution witnesses examined. Justice Bhardwaj emphasized that deprivation of liberty without ensuring timely trial violates Article 21 of the Constitution and held that even serious crimes do not override an accused's constitutional right to speedy trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case