HARI SINGH AND OTHERS vs ANSUIYA YADAV AND ANOTHER — COCP/3781/2023

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011587002023

Filing Number

COCP/63993/2023

Filing Date

06-Dec-2023

Registration No

COCP/3781/2023

Registration Date

07-Dec-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain

Coram

Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARI SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. NAVEEN SHARMA (BHARDWAJ)

  2. 2.SAVITRI SINGH

  3. 3.PADAM SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANSUIYA YADAV AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.ASHWANI KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Pankaj JainView PDF

    Case Summary: COCP/3781/2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a contempt petition involving a marital dispute settlement. After parties agreed to settle criminal charges arising from a dowry and abuse complaint by paying Rs. 1.5 crores and obtaining mutual divorce, respondent Ansuiya Yadav later backed out, claiming the settlement was for Rs. 3 crores and refusing to cooperate. The court found the respondents guilty of willful disobedience of court orders based on undertakings given during bail proceedings, but ultimately allowed settlement on modified terms: respondent deposits Rs. 50 lakhs for the child's education, mother retains custody, and all parties withdraw proceedings against each other. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/3781/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COCP/3781/2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a contempt petition involving a marital dispute settlement. After parties agreed to settle criminal charges arising from a dowry and abuse complaint by paying Rs. 1.5 crores and obtaining mutual divorce, respondent Ansuiya Yadav later backed out, claiming the settlement was for Rs. 3 crores and refusing to cooperate. The court found the respondents guilty of willful disobedience of court orders based on undertakings given during bail proceedings, but ultimately allowed settlement on modified terms: respondent deposits Rs. 50 lakhs for the child's education, mother retains custody, and all parties withdraw proceedings against each other. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case