HARISH CHANDER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL PUNJAB — CWP/37489/2019

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Jan-2020

CNR: PHHC011579732019

Filing Number

CWP/82991/2019

Filing Date

19-Dec-2019

Registration No

CWP/37489/2019

Registration Date

20-Dec-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.12 - MISC. PUNJAB ( 738 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARISH CHANDER

    Adv. SURINDER GARG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL PUNJAB

  2. 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB

  3. 3.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  4. 4.DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  5. 5.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

  6. 6.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

  7. 7.DIRECTOR

  8. 8.AMANPREET KAUR

  9. 9.GURDAS SINGH

  10. 10.DILBAG SINGH

  11. 11.YADWINDER SINGH ZAILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a petition challenging the allotment of a Municipal Council plot in Jaito by directing the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner to re-examine whether the allotment was illegal or contrary to government norms and take appropriate action if warranted. The court found that an inquiry report indicated the plot was allotted through open auction with due publicity, though it did not express any opinion on the merits of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jan-2020

    Other

  4. 19-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/37489/2019

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a petition challenging the allotment of a Municipal Council plot in Jaito by directing the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner to re-examine whether the allotment was illegal or contrary to government norms and take appropriate action if warranted. The court found that an inquiry report indicated the plot was allotted through open auction with due publicity, though it did not express any opinion on the merits of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case