HARISH CHANDER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL PUNJAB — CWP/37489/2019
Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.
CNR: PHHC011579732019
Next Hearing
06th January 2020
Filing Number
CWP/82991/2019
Filing Date
19-12-2019
Registration No
CWP/37489/2019
Registration Date
20-12-2019
Judge
MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Coram
MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.12 - MISC. PUNJAB ( 738 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARISH CHANDER
Adv. SURINDER GARG
Respondent(s)
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL PUNJAB
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
STATION HOUSE OFFICER
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DIRECTOR
AMANPREET KAUR
GURDAS SINGH
DILBAG SINGH
YADWINDER SINGH ZAILDAR
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
OTHER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-01-2020 | OTHER |
Orders
SUMMARY: The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a petition challenging the allotment of a Municipal Council plot in Jaito by directing the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner to re-examine whether the allotment was illegal or contrary to government norms and take appropriate action if warranted. The court found that an inquiry report indicated the plot was allotted through open auction with due publicity, though it did not express any opinion on the merits of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a petition challenging the allotment of a Municipal Council plot in Jaito by directing the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner to re-examine whether the allotment was illegal or contrary to government norms and take appropriate action if warranted. The court found that an inquiry report indicated the plot was allotted through open auction with due publicity, though it did not express any opinion on the merits of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts