ANUPAM SINGLA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/53920/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011541652025

Filing Number

CRM-M/80550/2025

Filing Date

19-Sep-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/53920/2025

Registration Date

22-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUPAM SINGLA

    Adv. Gurdarshan Singh Sidhu

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Summary: CRM-M/53920/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Anupam Singla, accused in a GST fraud case involving fake invoicing causing ₹32.59 crore loss to the government. Despite acknowledging the serious nature of charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and GST Act provisions, the court found that Singla had already undergone 5 years 9 months incarceration with trial progressing slowly (only 27 of 51 prosecution witnesses examined), warranting release on bail with standard conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/53920/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CRM-M/53920/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Anupam Singla, accused in a GST fraud case involving fake invoicing causing ₹32.59 crore loss to the government. Despite acknowledging the serious nature of charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and GST Act provisions, the court found that Singla had already undergone 5 years 9 months incarceration with trial progressing slowly (only 27 of 51 prosecution witnesses examined), warranting release on bail with standard conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case