DEEPALI GUPTA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/54630/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011541192025

Filing Number

CRM-M/80506/2025

Filing Date

19-Sep-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/54630/2025

Registration Date

24-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPALI GUPTA

    Adv. PRABHJOT SINGH MANN

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Deepali Gupta in FIR No. 336 (charges: criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery under IPC Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B) after the State counsel confirmed she had cooperated with investigation and required no further custodial interrogation. The court made the interim bail order absolute with conditions under BNSS Section 482(2), requiring continued cooperation with the investigating officer and clarifying that any arrest for additional offences requires court approval per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/54630/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Deepali Gupta in FIR No. 336 (charges: criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery under IPC Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B) after the State counsel confirmed she had cooperated with investigation and required no further custodial interrogation. The court made the interim bail order absolute with conditions under BNSS Section 482(2), requiring continued cooperation with the investigating officer and clarifying that any arrest for additional offences requires court approval per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case