SHAIFALY SHARMA vs DEEPAK SHARMA — TA/1230/2025
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011539232025
e-Filing Number
18-09-2025
Filing Number
TA/59976/2025
Filing Date
19-Sep-2025
Registration No
TA/1230/2025
Registration Date
19-Sep-2025
Judge
Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta
Coram
Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta
Bench Type
Single
Category
35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAIFALY SHARMA
Adv. Manu Loona
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEEPAK SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF
Case Summary: TA/1230/2025 - Shaifaly Sharma v. Deepak Sharma The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the transfer of a divorce petition (filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955) from Patiala Family Court to Fazilka Court. The court prioritized the wife's convenience, considering she is unemployed, economically dependent, living separately with a minor child at her parents' home in Fazilka, and must travel 251 km to Patiala. Multiple related proceedings (domestic violence, maintenance, restitution of conjugal rights) are pending at Fazilka, making consolidation desirable to avoid conflicting decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. TA/1230/2025
Case Summary: TA/1230/2025 - Shaifaly Sharma v. Deepak Sharma The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the transfer of a divorce petition (filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955) from Patiala Family Court to Fazilka Court. The court prioritized the wife's convenience, considering she is unemployed, economically dependent, living separately with a minor child at her parents' home in Fazilka, and must travel 251 km to Patiala. Multiple related proceedings (domestic violence, maintenance, restitution of conjugal rights) are pending at Fazilka, making consolidation desirable to avoid conflicting decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts