SUBHASH DAHIYA RAJESH LAMBA vs BRAHMJIT SINGH RANGI AND ANOTHER — COCP/4835/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10/12. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Sep-2025

CNR: PHHC011532052025

Filing Number

COCP/59731/2025

Filing Date

18-Sep-2025

Registration No

COCP/4835/2025

Registration Date

19-Sep-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10/12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH DAHIYA RAJESH LAMBA

  2. 2.BRAHMJIT SING RANGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BRAHMJIT SINGH RANGI AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.BRAHMJIT SING RANGI

  3. 3.BHARAT BHUSHAN GOGIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a contempt petition filed by Subhash Dahiya against Brahmjit Singh Rangi alleging violation of an earlier court order dated 11.7.2025. The earlier order had directed the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA), Rohtak to decide a pending representation within six weeks. The court found that the respondent authority had complied with the order by passing a reasoned Speaking Order dated 20.3.2026, as evidenced by a Compliance Report filed on 24.3.2026. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of with the rule discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/4835/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a contempt petition filed by Subhash Dahiya against Brahmjit Singh Rangi alleging violation of an earlier court order dated 11.7.2025. The earlier order had directed the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA), Rohtak to decide a pending representation within six weeks. The court found that the respondent authority had complied with the order by passing a reasoned Speaking Order dated 20.3.2026, as evidenced by a Compliance Report filed on 24.3.2026. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of with the rule discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case