MANJIT KAUR vs FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — CWP/28833/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Dec-2023

CNR: PHHC011524172023

Filing Number

CWP/61427/2023

Filing Date

22-Nov-2023

Registration No

CWP/28833/2023

Registration Date

19-Dec-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

20.28 - SCOSB UOI RETIRAL/PENSION ( 460 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJIT KAUR

    Adv. S.K.SANDHIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.ZONAL MANAGER

  3. 3.GENERAL MANAGER

  4. 4.AREA MANAGER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Manjit Kaur's petition seeking family pension and retiral benefits for her deceased husband, Darshan Singh (an FCI Manager). The court found that FCI had already released all admissible terminal dues including gratuity (Rs. 3,37,914), leave encashment (Rs. 86,135), and CPF dues, following FCI Staff Regulations 1971. The petitioner was granted liberty to seek interest on delayed payments by filing a representation with FCI authorities, which must be decided within six weeks with a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Dec-2023

    Other

  4. 22-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/28833/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Manjit Kaur's petition seeking family pension and retiral benefits for her deceased husband, Darshan Singh (an FCI Manager). The court found that FCI had already released all admissible terminal dues including gratuity (Rs. 3,37,914), leave encashment (Rs. 86,135), and CPF dues, following FCI Staff Regulations 1971. The petitioner was granted liberty to seek interest on delayed payments by filing a representation with FCI authorities, which must be decided within six weeks with a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case