RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/28162/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 and 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Sep-2025

CNR: PHHC011523472025

e-Filing Number

17-09-2025

Filing Number

CWP/59362/2025

Filing Date

17-Sep-2025

Registration No

CWP/28162/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Bench Type

Single

Category

31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 and 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. NAVEEN SHEOKAND

  2. 2.Rajesh Kumar and others

  3. 3.Deputy Commissioner

  4. 4.Balwant singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Rajesh Kumar and others

  3. 3.Deputy Commissioner

  4. 4.Balwant singh

  5. 5.Block Development and Panchayat officer

  6. 6.Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Nimoth

  7. 7.Arvind Kumar

  8. 8.Jitender

  9. 9.Ajay Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana restored writ petition CWP-28162-2025, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution, allowing petitioner Rajesh Kumar's restoration application. Subsequently, petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the main petition with liberty to pursue remedies in competent courts, which the court granted, dismissing the petition as withdrawn with liberty to avail other legal remedies regarding the alleged illegal tile encroachment on petitioners' private land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Nov-2025

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

  4. 17-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/28162/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana restored writ petition CWP-28162-2025, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution, allowing petitioner Rajesh Kumar's restoration application. Subsequently, petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the main petition with liberty to pursue remedies in competent courts, which the court granted, dismissing the petition as withdrawn with liberty to avail other legal remedies regarding the alleged illegal tile encroachment on petitioners' private land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case