MANDEEP KAUR vs JASPREET SINGH — TA/1409/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011522352024

e-Filing Number

29-10-2024

Filing Number

TA/64406/2024

Filing Date

31-Oct-2024

Registration No

TA/1409/2024

Registration Date

05-Nov-2024

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANDEEP KAUR

    Adv. JAGDISH SINGH MAHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JASPREET SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/1409/2024 Court Decision (15.05.2026): Justice Nidhi Gupta dismissed Mandeep Kaur's petition seeking transfer of her husband Jaspreet Singh's matrimonial case from Family Court Gurdaspur to Amritsar. The court found insufficient grounds for transfer despite the 75 km distance and petitioner's financial hardship, noting she is a graduate and can travel for scheduled hearings. Key Reasoning: While acknowledging the general legal principle favoring wives in transfer cases, the court applied precedent from the Supreme Court (*Anindita Das v. Srijit Das*) and its own prior judgments, holding that mere distance and inconvenience without exceptional circumstances do not warrant venue transfer in matrimonial disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/1409/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/1409/2024 Court Decision (15.05.2026): Justice Nidhi Gupta dismissed Mandeep Kaur's petition seeking transfer of her husband Jaspreet Singh's matrimonial case from Family Court Gurdaspur to Amritsar. The court found insufficient grounds for transfer despite the 75 km distance and petitioner's financial hardship, noting she is a graduate and can travel for scheduled hearings. Key Reasoning: While acknowledging the general legal principle favoring wives in transfer cases, the court applied precedent from the Supreme Court (*Anindita Das v. Srijit Das*) and its own prior judgments, holding that mere distance and inconvenience without exceptional circumstances do not warrant venue transfer in matrimonial disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case