HARYANA STATE AIDS CONTROL SOCIETY vs EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION AND OTHERS — CWP/36167/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011511082019
Filing Number
CWP/79663/2019
Filing Date
09-Dec-2019
Registration No
CWP/36167/2019
Registration Date
11-Dec-2019
Judge
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Coram
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Bench Type
Single
Category
18.5 - LABOUR ( 452 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARYANA STATE AIDS CONTROL SOCIETY
Adv. VIVEK SALATHIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION AND OTHERS
-
2.CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION
-
3.PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-II-CUM-LABOUR COURT. CHANDIGARH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/36167/2019 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana modified the Central Government Industrial Tribunal's order requiring Haryana State AIDS Control Society to deposit 40% of an EPF assessment of ₹55,37,910. The court reduced the pre-deposit requirement from 40% to 20%, which the petitioner had already deposited, citing the society's public welfare functions, financial constraints dependent on government allocations, and the appeal reaching final hearing stage with no prejudice to the respondent department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Dec-2019
Other
-
09-Dec-2019
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/36167/2019
Case Summary: CWP/36167/2019 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana modified the Central Government Industrial Tribunal's order requiring Haryana State AIDS Control Society to deposit 40% of an EPF assessment of ₹55,37,910. The court reduced the pre-deposit requirement from 40% to 20%, which the petitioner had already deposited, citing the society's public welfare functions, financial constraints dependent on government allocations, and the appeal reaching final hearing stage with no prejudice to the respondent department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts