RAJWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRM-M/52800/2025
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011502802025
Filing Number
CRM-M/78560/2025
Filing Date
15-Sep-2025
Registration No
CRM-M/52800/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth
Coram
Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth
Category
38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS
Adv. AAJESHWER SINGH GREWAL
-
2.RAJWINDER SINGH
-
3.HARPREET SINGH
-
4.MANPREET SINGH
-
5.LABH SINGH
-
6.JASWINDER SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.HARPREET SINGH
-
3.MANPREET SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No. 130 (dated 22.09.2022) registered under Sections 326, 341, 324, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station Raman, District Bathinda, following a verified compromise between all parties dated 01.08.2025. The trial court confirmed the compromise was genuine and voluntary, with both complainants consenting to quashing. The court applied precedent principles allowing FIR quashing in cases of genuine settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/52800/2025
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No. 130 (dated 22.09.2022) registered under Sections 326, 341, 324, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station Raman, District Bathinda, following a verified compromise between all parties dated 01.08.2025. The trial court confirmed the compromise was genuine and voluntary, with both complainants consenting to quashing. The court applied precedent principles allowing FIR quashing in cases of genuine settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts