DARSHAN SINGH vs SUKHWINDER SINGH — CR/7933/2019

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011500682019

Filing Number

CR/79170/2019

Filing Date

06-Dec-2019

Registration No

CR/7933/2019

Registration Date

09-Dec-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.54 - CR FILED BY TENANT AGNST FO/JUDG IN RENT ACT PB. ( 531 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DARSHAN SINGH

    Adv. LAKSHAY BECTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKHWINDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas BahlView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/7933/2019 Darshan Singh v. Sukhwinder Singh The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partially allowed tenant Darshan Singh's revision petition challenging a composite order from the Rent Controller (20.08.2019) that simultaneously rejected his leave to contest application and issued an eviction order without affording him review rights under Section 38(7)(e) of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995. Following binding precedent from a Division Bench judgment, the court set aside the eviction order to the extent it was passed without granting the tenant opportunity to seek review, and remanded the matter to allow the petitioner at least 10 days to file a review application against the rejection of his leave to contest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/7933/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/7933/2019 Darshan Singh v. Sukhwinder Singh The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partially allowed tenant Darshan Singh's revision petition challenging a composite order from the Rent Controller (20.08.2019) that simultaneously rejected his leave to contest application and issued an eviction order without affording him review rights under Section 38(7)(e) of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995. Following binding precedent from a Division Bench judgment, the court set aside the eviction order to the extent it was passed without granting the tenant opportunity to seek review, and remanded the matter to allow the petitioner at least 10 days to file a review application against the rejection of his leave to contest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case