PALWINDER SINGH vs JAGIR SINGH AND ORS — CRM-A/207/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011499842018

Filing Number

CRM-A/207/2018

Filing Date

12-Jan-2018

Registration No

CRM-A/207/2018

Registration Date

19-Jan-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara , Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur

Coram

Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara , Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur

Bench Type

Double

Category

17.1 - LEAVE TO APPEAL ( 145 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PALWINDER SINGH

    Adv. L M GULATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGIR SINGH AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara,mrs. Justice Sukhvinder KaurView PDF

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Palwinder Singh's leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of Jagir Singh and others, and transferred the matter to the Sessions Court to be registered as an appeal under Section 372 CrPC/413 BNSS, 2023. The court relied on the Supreme Court's recent interpretation in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) recognizing victims' fundamental right to appeal acquittals, and granted relief to prevent the complainant from refiling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Dec-2018

    Mr. Justice A.B. Chaudhari,mr. Justice Harnaresh Singh Gill

  4. 13-Sep-2018

    Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh,mr. Justice A.B. Chaudhari

  5. 05-Apr-2018

    Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh,mr. Justice A.B. Chaudhari

  6. 12-Jan-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-A/207/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Palwinder Singh's leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of Jagir Singh and others, and transferred the matter to the Sessions Court to be registered as an appeal under Section 372 CrPC/413 BNSS, 2023. The court relied on the Supreme Court's recent interpretation in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) recognizing victims' fundamental right to appeal acquittals, and granted relief to prevent the complainant from refiling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case