PALWINDER SINGH vs JAGIR SINGH AND ORS — CRM-A/207/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC011499842018

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRM-A/207/2018

Filing Date

12-01-2018

Registration No

CRM-A/207/2018

Registration Date

19-01-2018

Judge

MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA , MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR

Coram

MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA , MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR

Bench Type

Double

Category

17.1 - LEAVE TO APPEAL ( 145 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

PALWINDER SINGH

Adv. L M GULATI

Respondent(s)

JAGIR SINGH AND ORS

Orders

05-04-2018

MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH,MR. JUSTICE A.B. CHAUDHARI

13-09-2018

MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH,MR. JUSTICE A.B. CHAUDHARI

18-12-2018

MR. JUSTICE A.B. CHAUDHARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

13-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA,MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR

The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Palwinder Singh's leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of Jagir Singh and others, and transferred the matter to the Sessions Court to be registered as an appeal under Section 372 CrPC/413 BNSS, 2023. The court relied on the Supreme Court's recent interpretation in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) recognizing victims' fundamental right to appeal acquittals, and granted relief to prevent the complainant from refiling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Palwinder Singh's leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of Jagir Singh and others, and transferred the matter to the Sessions Court to be registered as an appeal under Section 372 CrPC/413 BNSS, 2023. The court relied on the Supreme Court's recent interpretation in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) recognizing victims' fundamental right to appeal acquittals, and granted relief to prevent the complainant from refiling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case