HARDIK BHARTI vs CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ANOTHER — CWP/27479/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Sep-2025

CNR: PHHC011487122025

e-Filing Number

11-09-2025

Filing Number

CWP/58024/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

CWP/27479/2025

Registration Date

11-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.13 - MISC. HARYANA ( 739 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARDIK BHARTI

    Adv. MANAN BHARDWAJ

  2. 2.HARDIK BHARTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.HARDIK BHARTI

  3. 3.District Education Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Summary of CWP/27479/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw. The court had prima facie found that the petitioner suppressed vital facts—specifically that he had previously filed a Lok Adalat petition (withdrawn 29.01.2025) and a pending civil suit for damages before approaching the high court—and that the school had already issued the migration certificate and refunded the disputed ₹750 amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/27479/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP/27479/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw. The court had prima facie found that the petitioner suppressed vital facts—specifically that he had previously filed a Lok Adalat petition (withdrawn 29.01.2025) and a pending civil suit for damages before approaching the high court—and that the school had already issued the migration certificate and refunded the disputed ₹750 amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case