GURWINDER SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL PUNJAB — CWP/35430/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Dec-2019

CNR: PHHC011481002019

Filing Number

CWP/78357/2019

Filing Date

03-Dec-2019

Registration No

CWP/35430/2019

Registration Date

04-Dec-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Bench Type

Single

Category

68.7 - SERVICE-EDU-PUNJAB(SECONDARY)(TGT) ( 796 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURWINDER SINGH AND ORS

    Adv. BALTEJ SINGH SIDHU

  2. 2.SARVARINDER SINGH

  3. 3.SATPAL SINGH

  4. 4.PARMINDER SINGH

  5. 5.GURPREET SINGH

  6. 6.BEANT SINGH

  7. 7.SUSHIL KUMAR

  8. 8.SIKANDER SINGH

  9. 9.HARISH CHANDER

  10. 10.JAGTAR SINGH

  11. 11.GURPREET KAUR

  12. 12.GURPREET KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL PUNJAB

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    The writ petition challenging the November 2019 recruitment advertisements for teacher posts (requiring 55% marks at graduation level) as contrary to the original September 2017 advertisement was dismissed as not pressed, after the petitioners' counsel chose not to pursue the case in light of the state's reply. The court did not adjudicate the substantive merits of the challenge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Dec-2019

    Other

  4. 03-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/35430/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition challenging the November 2019 recruitment advertisements for teacher posts (requiring 55% marks at graduation level) as contrary to the original September 2017 advertisement was dismissed as not pressed, after the petitioners' counsel chose not to pursue the case in light of the state's reply. The court did not adjudicate the substantive merits of the challenge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case