SURBHI GILHOTRA vs PARTEEK GILHOTRA — TA/1207/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Sep-2025

CNR: PHHC011480372025

e-Filing Number

10-09-2025

Filing Number

TA/57768/2025

Filing Date

10-Sep-2025

Registration No

TA/1207/2025

Registration Date

16-Sep-2025

Judge

Mrs. Justice Archana Puri

Coram

Mrs. Justice Archana Puri

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURBHI GILHOTRA

    Adv. NAVEEN BATRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARTEEK GILHOTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Archana PuriView PDF

    Summary of TA/1207/2025: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted Surbhi Gilhotra's transfer application, ordering that the Section 13 Hindu Marriage Act petition (HMA/804/2025) filed by her husband Parteek Gilhotra be transferred from Family Court, Ludhiana to Family Court, Yamunanagar. The court found transfer appropriate given that the couple's child resides with the applicant in Yamunanagar, other related petitions are pending there, the applicant lacks earning capacity, and the distance between jurisdictions is 160 km. The respondent did not oppose the transfer, and both parties were directed to appear before the Yamunanagar court within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/1207/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of TA/1207/2025: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted Surbhi Gilhotra's transfer application, ordering that the Section 13 Hindu Marriage Act petition (HMA/804/2025) filed by her husband Parteek Gilhotra be transferred from Family Court, Ludhiana to Family Court, Yamunanagar. The court found transfer appropriate given that the couple's child resides with the applicant in Yamunanagar, other related petitions are pending there, the applicant lacks earning capacity, and the distance between jurisdictions is 160 km. The respondent did not oppose the transfer, and both parties were directed to appear before the Yamunanagar court within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case