THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs SEIYARA AND OTHERS — FAO/6173/2025

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Nov-2025

CNR: PHHC011479602025

Filing Number

FAO/57738/2025

Filing Date

10-Sep-2025

Registration No

FAO/6173/2025

Registration Date

28-Oct-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Coram

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.4 - ORIENTAL INSURANCE ( 905 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. VINOD CHAUDHRI

  2. 2.OIC LTD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SEIYARA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SIEYARA

  3. 3.NAFEEZ

  4. 4.SHIV KUMAR

  5. 5.MANOJ KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh RathorView PDF

    FAO/6173/2025 - Summary The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Oriental Insurance Company's appeal challenging compensation awards totaling Rs. 15,59,213 for the death of 16-year-old Jubair and Rs. 20,000-24,054 for injured claimants Suhail and Sahil from a road accident. The court held that the truck driver's rash and negligent driving caused the collision—not the tractor driver's minority or lack of license—and rejected the insurer's arguments that the old tractor was unroadworthy or that absence of a postmortem undermined causation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/6173/2025

casestatus.in Summary

FAO/6173/2025 - Summary The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Oriental Insurance Company's appeal challenging compensation awards totaling Rs. 15,59,213 for the death of 16-year-old Jubair and Rs. 20,000-24,054 for injured claimants Suhail and Sahil from a road accident. The court held that the truck driver's rash and negligent driving caused the collision—not the tractor driver's minority or lack of license—and rejected the insurer's arguments that the old tractor was unroadworthy or that absence of a postmortem undermined causation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case