VISHAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/51571/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011479432025

Filing Number

CRM-M/77318/2025

Filing Date

10-Sep-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/51571/2025

Registration Date

11-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL

    Adv. SURAM SINGH RANA

  2. 2.VISHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.VISHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M/51571/2025: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Vishal in an NDPS Act case involving alleged ganja smuggling. The court found that Vishal had been in custody for over 3.5 years, only 9 of 16 prosecution witnesses (all police officials) had been examined, and trial conclusion would take considerable time. Justice H.S. Grewal held that continuous detention would not serve justice and granted bail on furnishing surety bonds, applying the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception," while cautioning that bail could be cancelled if the petitioner commits further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/51571/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M/51571/2025: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Vishal in an NDPS Act case involving alleged ganja smuggling. The court found that Vishal had been in custody for over 3.5 years, only 9 of 16 prosecution witnesses (all police officials) had been examined, and trial conclusion would take considerable time. Justice H.S. Grewal held that continuous detention would not serve justice and granted bail on furnishing surety bonds, applying the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception," while cautioning that bail could be cancelled if the petitioner commits further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case