BHARTI vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CWP/25719/2023

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Nov-2023

CNR: PHHC011476902023

Filing Number

CWP/59620/2023

Filing Date

14-Nov-2023

Registration No

CWP/25719/2023

Registration Date

14-Nov-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Bench Type

Single

Category

68.2 - GOVT SERVICE (PB) PENSION/RETIRAL BENEFIT ( 778 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARTI

    Adv. VK SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.DIRECTOR

  3. 3.CIVIL SURGEON

  4. 4.DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER

  5. 5.ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A AND E

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    Bharti sought a writ of mandamus to compel the State of Punjab to release pensionary and terminal benefits (family pension, gratuity, provident fund, and other entitlements) following her husband's death while in service under the Old Pension Scheme. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the respondents had already granted the relief sought, rendering further judicial intervention unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Nov-2023

    Other

  4. 14-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/25719/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Bharti sought a writ of mandamus to compel the State of Punjab to release pensionary and terminal benefits (family pension, gratuity, provident fund, and other entitlements) following her husband's death while in service under the Old Pension Scheme. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the respondents had already granted the relief sought, rendering further judicial intervention unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case