MANJIT SINGH vs JAGRAJ SINGH AND OTHERS — CR/6133/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011476622022
Filing Number
CR/59381/2022
Filing Date
20-Dec-2022
Registration No
CR/6133/2022
Registration Date
20-Dec-2022
Judge
Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal
Coram
Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal
Bench Type
Single
Category
30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANJIT SINGH
Adv. NARINDER SINGH DADWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAGRAJ SINGH AND OTHERS
-
2.SATNAM SINGH
-
3.DALJIT KAUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Vikram AggarwalView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Manjit Singh's revision petition challenging the lower court's order requiring him to pay ad-valorem court fee on Rs.27,50,000 claimed as damages for a false case registration. The court held that since the compensation amount was specifically quantified in the plaint's prayer clause, ad-valorem court fee was mandatory under CPC Order 7 Rule 11, affirming the trial court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. CR/6133/2022
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Manjit Singh's revision petition challenging the lower court's order requiring him to pay ad-valorem court fee on Rs.27,50,000 claimed as damages for a false case registration. The court held that since the compensation amount was specifically quantified in the plaint's prayer clause, ad-valorem court fee was mandatory under CPC Order 7 Rule 11, affirming the trial court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts