SUNIL DEVI AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — RFA/1830/2023

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011476382023

Filing Number

RFA/59607/2023

Filing Date

09-Nov-2023

Registration No

RFA/1830/2023

Registration Date

28-Nov-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

25.4 - RFA (LAND ACQUISITION) HARYANA ( 494 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL-I(RFA) BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL DEVI AND ANOTHER

    Adv. Jay Prakash Jangu

  2. 2.ARNESH @ ARNESH KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR

  3. 3.ADMINISTRATOR HUDA

  4. 4.SAVITA

  5. 5.SURESH

  6. 6.RAMESH

  7. 7.JOGINDER

  8. 8.VIRENDER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: RFA-1830-2023 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed appellants Sunil Devi and another's appeal seeking enhanced land acquisition compensation for 16.37 acres in Gurugram. The court condoned a 2298-day delay in filing, emphasizing that in compulsory land acquisition cases, courts must adopt a liberal justice-oriented approach and maintain parity among similarly situated landowners covered by the same acquisition notification. The court awarded compensation at ₹4,78,79,070 per acre with statutory benefits (consistent with an earlier 2019 judgment in *Vivek Kumar v. State of Haryana*), but denied interest for the delayed period to balance the State's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/1830/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RFA-1830-2023 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed appellants Sunil Devi and another's appeal seeking enhanced land acquisition compensation for 16.37 acres in Gurugram. The court condoned a 2298-day delay in filing, emphasizing that in compulsory land acquisition cases, courts must adopt a liberal justice-oriented approach and maintain parity among similarly situated landowners covered by the same acquisition notification. The court awarded compensation at ₹4,78,79,070 per acre with statutory benefits (consistent with an earlier 2019 judgment in *Vivek Kumar v. State of Haryana*), but denied interest for the delayed period to balance the State's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case