SUNIL DEVI AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — RFA/1830/2023
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
CNR: PHHC011476382023
Filing Number
RFA/59607/2023
Filing Date
09-11-2023
Registration No
RFA/1830/2023
Registration Date
28-11-2023
Judge
MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Coram
MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
25.4 - RFA (LAND ACQUISITION) HARYANA ( 494 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL-I(RFA) BRANCH
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNIL DEVI AND ANOTHER
Adv. Jay Prakash Jangu
ARNESH @ ARNESH KUMARI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR
ADMINISTRATOR HUDA
SAVITA
SURESH
RAMESH
JOGINDER
VIRENDER
Orders
Case Summary: RFA-1830-2023 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed appellants Sunil Devi and another's appeal seeking enhanced land acquisition compensation for 16.37 acres in Gurugram. The court condoned a 2298-day delay in filing, emphasizing that in compulsory land acquisition cases, courts must adopt a liberal justice-oriented approach and maintain parity among similarly situated landowners covered by the same acquisition notification. The court awarded compensation at ₹4,78,79,070 per acre with statutory benefits (consistent with an earlier 2019 judgment in *Vivek Kumar v. State of Haryana*), but denied interest for the delayed period to balance the State's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RFA-1830-2023 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed appellants Sunil Devi and another's appeal seeking enhanced land acquisition compensation for 16.37 acres in Gurugram. The court condoned a 2298-day delay in filing, emphasizing that in compulsory land acquisition cases, courts must adopt a liberal justice-oriented approach and maintain parity among similarly situated landowners covered by the same acquisition notification. The court awarded compensation at ₹4,78,79,070 per acre with statutory benefits (consistent with an earlier 2019 judgment in *Vivek Kumar v. State of Haryana*), but denied interest for the delayed period to balance the State's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts