MAN SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH COLLECTOR DISTRICT JIND — RFA/1204/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011468532025

Filing Number

RFA/57266/2025

Filing Date

09-Sep-2025

Registration No

RFA/1204/2025

Registration Date

17-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Coram

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

25.4 - RFA (LAND ACQUISITION) HARYANA ( 494 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL-I(RFA) BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAN SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. ARIHANT JAIN

  2. 2.MAN SINGH

  3. 3.JAGE RAM

  4. 4.KRISHAN

  5. 5.KRISHAN

  6. 6.JAI KISHAN

  7. 7.BALWANT SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH COLLECTOR DISTRICT JIND

  2. 2.MAN SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF

    Summary of RFA-1204-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of 29 connected land acquisition appeals by fixing the market value of 95 kanals 15 marlas in Village Pindara, Jind at Rs.1,42,16,456 per acre (calculated using a 12% compound annual appreciation from a 2006 sale deed), rejecting the Reference Court's reliance on a 2015 sale deed at collector rates. The court also corrected the Reference Court's error in applying a 1.25 multiplier to urban land, limiting it to 1.0, and awarded 100% solatium plus statutory benefits under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/1204/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of RFA-1204-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of 29 connected land acquisition appeals by fixing the market value of 95 kanals 15 marlas in Village Pindara, Jind at Rs.1,42,16,456 per acre (calculated using a 12% compound annual appreciation from a 2006 sale deed), rejecting the Reference Court's reliance on a 2015 sale deed at collector rates. The court also corrected the Reference Court's error in applying a 1.25 multiplier to urban land, limiting it to 1.0, and awarded 100% solatium plus statutory benefits under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case