SAHIBDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CRM-M/57583/2023

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC011463792023

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRM-M/87243/2023

Filing Date

08-11-2023

Registration No

CRM-M/57583/2023

Registration Date

14-11-2023

Judge

MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH

Coram

MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH

Bench Type

Single

Category

47 - CRIMINAL MISC.(DIRECTION) ( 215 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

No Acts defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

SAHIBDEEP SINGH

Adv. NEERAJ CHANDEL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

CHIEF MINISTER OF PUNJAB

DGP PUNJAB

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

ACP (Assistant Commissioner of Police) JASROOP KAUR BATH

SHO (Station House Officer) NEERAJ CHAUDHARY

ASI (Assistant Sub-Inspector) SUKHPAL SINGH

MANDEEP SINGH @ MANNU

Orders

15-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana (or a delegated Deputy Commissioner) to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2020 within one month by passing a speaking order, while making an independent assessment without the Court's interference on merits. The Court clarified it was not returning any findings on the representation's contents but directed the police to assess threat perception and provide protection to the petitioner if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana (or a delegated Deputy Commissioner) to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2020 within one month by passing a speaking order, while making an independent assessment without the Court's interference on merits. The Court clarified it was not returning any findings on the representation's contents but directed the police to assess threat perception and provide protection to the petitioner if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case