SAHIBDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CRM-M/57583/2023

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011463792023

Filing Number

CRM-M/87243/2023

Filing Date

08-Nov-2023

Registration No

CRM-M/57583/2023

Registration Date

14-Nov-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

47 - CRIMINAL MISC.(DIRECTION) ( 215 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHIBDEEP SINGH

    Adv. NEERAJ CHANDEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.CHIEF MINISTER OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.DGP PUNJAB

  4. 4.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  5. 5.ACP (Assistant Commissioner of Police) JASROOP KAUR BATH

  6. 6.SHO (Station House Officer) NEERAJ CHAUDHARY

  7. 7.ASI (Assistant Sub-Inspector) SUKHPAL SINGH

  8. 8.MANDEEP SINGH @ MANNU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana (or a delegated Deputy Commissioner) to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2020 within one month by passing a speaking order, while making an independent assessment without the Court's interference on merits. The Court clarified it was not returning any findings on the representation's contents but directed the police to assess threat perception and provide protection to the petitioner if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/57583/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana (or a delegated Deputy Commissioner) to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2020 within one month by passing a speaking order, while making an independent assessment without the Court's interference on merits. The Court clarified it was not returning any findings on the representation's contents but directed the police to assess threat perception and provide protection to the petitioner if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case