CHIRAG JAIN vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/26990/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Sep-2025

CNR: PHHC011460772025

e-Filing Number

07-09-2025

Filing Number

CWP/56992/2025

Filing Date

08-Sep-2025

Registration No

CWP/26990/2025

Registration Date

09-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.13 - MISC. HARYANA ( 739 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHIRAG JAIN

    Adv. ARJUN KAUSHAL

  2. 2.State of Haryana and Others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and Others

  3. 3.Department of social justice empowerment welfare of sc and BC

  4. 4.Registrar General Punjab and Haryana High Court

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Chirag Jain's petition seeking appointment as legal guardian of his father (in vegetative state since 2023) by directing the competent authority to constitute a medical board within two weeks to assess the father's physical and mental condition, following guidelines established in the Surekha v. Axis Bank judgment. All stakeholders, including the father's wife and daughters, consented to the petition, with further proceedings to follow as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/26990/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Chirag Jain's petition seeking appointment as legal guardian of his father (in vegetative state since 2023) by directing the competent authority to constitute a medical board within two weeks to assess the father's physical and mental condition, following guidelines established in the Surekha v. Axis Bank judgment. All stakeholders, including the father's wife and daughters, consented to the petition, with further proceedings to follow as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case