PAL SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CWP/25886/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Nov-2023

CNR: PHHC011445932023

Filing Number

CWP/58381/2023

Filing Date

06-Nov-2023

Registration No

CWP/25886/2023

Registration Date

15-Nov-2023

Judge

Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin , Justice (To Be Nominated)

Coram

Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin , Justice (To Be Nominated)

Bench Type

Double

Category

18.12 - LAND LAWS D.B. ( 449 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAL SINGH

    Adv. VEENA HOODA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

  2. 2.COMMISSIONER ROHTAK DIVISON

  3. 3.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFFICER CUM ASSTT COLLECTOR

  5. 5.TEHSILDAR

  6. 6.BDPO

  7. 7.GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE MAROT

  8. 8.RAJPAL SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin,justice (To Be Nominated)View PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition after the Gram Panchayat Marot submitted an affidavit confirming that land possession had been properly transferred to it and illegal constructions on the disputed land (Khasra No.40/20/1) had been demolished and removed. The court found no further orders necessary as the relief sought had been substantially achieved, and accordingly disposed of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Nov-2023

    Other

  4. 06-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/25886/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition after the Gram Panchayat Marot submitted an affidavit confirming that land possession had been properly transferred to it and illegal constructions on the disputed land (Khasra No.40/20/1) had been demolished and removed. The court found no further orders necessary as the relief sought had been substantially achieved, and accordingly disposed of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case