RAMANDEEP KAUR vs GURKIRPAL SINGH — TA/1146/2025

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Sep-2025

CNR: PHHC011436022025

e-Filing Number

04-09-2025

Filing Number

TA/56015/2025

Filing Date

04-Sep-2025

Registration No

TA/1146/2025

Registration Date

04-Sep-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMANDEEP KAUR

    Adv. SANJIV KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURKIRPAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/1146/2025 Ramandeep Kaur v. Gurkirpal Singh (High Court of Punjab and Haryana, May 12, 2026) The court dismissed Ramandeep Kaur's transfer application seeking to shift her husband's divorce petition from Dera Bassi Family Court to Ambala Court. Justice Nidhi Gupta found that Kaur's claims of safety concerns lacked supporting evidence—no complaints, medical documents, or contemporaneous materials were produced. While Kaur alleged the respondent had assaulted her publicly, the court deemed these bare assertions insufficient to warrant transfer. The court reasoned that Dera Bassi has proper territorial jurisdiction (parties married at Zirakpur and last cohabited at Dera Bassi), and comparative convenience favored the original forum since Kaur resides near Chandigarh while the respondent (a Lieutenant Colonel) is posted at Leh and must travel substantially for proceedings regardless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/1146/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/1146/2025 Ramandeep Kaur v. Gurkirpal Singh (High Court of Punjab and Haryana, May 12, 2026) The court dismissed Ramandeep Kaur's transfer application seeking to shift her husband's divorce petition from Dera Bassi Family Court to Ambala Court. Justice Nidhi Gupta found that Kaur's claims of safety concerns lacked supporting evidence—no complaints, medical documents, or contemporaneous materials were produced. While Kaur alleged the respondent had assaulted her publicly, the court deemed these bare assertions insufficient to warrant transfer. The court reasoned that Dera Bassi has proper territorial jurisdiction (parties married at Zirakpur and last cohabited at Dera Bassi), and comparative convenience favored the original forum since Kaur resides near Chandigarh while the respondent (a Lieutenant Colonel) is posted at Leh and must travel substantially for proceedings regardless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case