M/S MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - Satya Pal Jain (Sr. Adv.) — CWP/25351/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011420162023
Filing Number
CWP/57321/2023
Filing Date
31-Oct-2023
Registration No
CWP/25351/2023
Registration Date
07-Nov-2023
Judge
Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal , Ms. Justice Lapita Banerji
Coram
Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal , Ms. Justice Lapita Banerji
Bench Type
Double
Category
6.42 - GOODS AND SERVICE TAX WRIT HARYANA (INDIRECT) ( 392 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD
Adv. RISHAB SINGLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - Satya Pal Jain (Sr. Adv.)
-
2.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOOD AND SERVICE TAX GURUGRAM COMMISSIONERATE
-
3.JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, GURUGRAM COMMISSIONERATE
-
4.ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal,ms. Justice Lapita BanerjiView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Mitsubishi Electric India's withdrawal of its petition challenging a GST show cause notice dated 29.09.2023, granting liberty to respond to the notice. The court clarified that the petitioner may raise all available defenses, including challenging the validity of the show cause notice itself under Section 73(6) of the CGST Act, 2017. The adjudicating authority was directed to decide the response within two months of receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Nov-2023
Other
-
31-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/25351/2023
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Mitsubishi Electric India's withdrawal of its petition challenging a GST show cause notice dated 29.09.2023, granting liberty to respond to the notice. The court clarified that the petitioner may raise all available defenses, including challenging the validity of the show cause notice itself under Section 73(6) of the CGST Act, 2017. The adjudicating authority was directed to decide the response within two months of receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts