MANOJ KUMAR AND ANR. vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CRM-M/57870/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 174 A. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011417872022

Filing Number

CRM-M/84823/2022

Filing Date

08-Dec-2022

Registration No

CRM-M/57870/2022

Registration Date

08-Dec-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.3 - PROCEEDING STAYED IN QUASHING ( 197 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 174 A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR AND ANR.

    Adv. DILPREET SINGH GANDHI

  2. 2.KANHIYALAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE BANK OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-57870/2022 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 829 (Section 174-A IPC) registered against Manoj Kumar and Kanhiya Lal. The petitioners had been declared proclaimed offenders in a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 complaint but surrendered before the trial court on 31.10.2022 and 03.11.2022 respectively—prior to FIR registration on 04.11.2022. The court found that since the petitioners appeared voluntarily after proclamation and before FIR registration, the subsequent FIR under Section 174-A IPC was unnecessary and was accordingly quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/57870/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-57870/2022 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 829 (Section 174-A IPC) registered against Manoj Kumar and Kanhiya Lal. The petitioners had been declared proclaimed offenders in a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 complaint but surrendered before the trial court on 31.10.2022 and 03.11.2022 respectively—prior to FIR registration on 04.11.2022. The court found that since the petitioners appeared voluntarily after proclamation and before FIR registration, the subsequent FIR under Section 174-A IPC was unnecessary and was accordingly quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case