SURINDER PAL SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/33652/2019
Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011398562019
Next Hearing
20th November 2019
Filing Number
CWP/74294/2019
Filing Date
16-11-2019
Registration No
CWP/33652/2019
Registration Date
18-11-2019
Judge
MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI , MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Coram
MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI , MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Bench Type
Double
Category
8.5 - HUID PUNJAB(HOUSING URBAN INDL. DEVELOPMENT) ( 406 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURINDER PAL SINGH
Adv. TEJINDERBIR SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
ESTATE OFFICER GMADA
ESTATE OFFICER OF PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI , MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
OTHER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-11-2019 | OTHER |
Orders
The court allowed the writ petition and quashed non-construction fee demand notices dated 28.12.2012 and 10.12.2018 against the petitioner. The court held that the petitioner cannot be penalized for non-construction when the respondents prevented him from raising construction by keeping his building plan pending for years without decision. The court directed respondents to decide the petitioner's building plan application within four months and clarified that non-construction fees cannot be levied during the pendency of plan sanction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the writ petition and quashed non-construction fee demand notices dated 28.12.2012 and 10.12.2018 against the petitioner. The court held that the petitioner cannot be penalized for non-construction when the respondents prevented him from raising construction by keeping his building plan pending for years without decision. The court directed respondents to decide the petitioner's building plan application within four months and clarified that non-construction fees cannot be levied during the pendency of plan sanction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts