SURINDER SINGH ALIAS HAPPY ALIAS GULLI vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/48653/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011387972025

Filing Number

CRM-M/72717/2025

Filing Date

28-Aug-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/48653/2025

Registration Date

29-Aug-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURINDER SINGH ALIAS HAPPY ALIAS GULLI

    Adv. NIKHIL GHAI

  2. 2.SURINDER SINGH @ HAPPY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.SURINDER SINGH @ HAPPY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/48653/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Surinder Singh @ Happy @ Gulli in a murder case (FIR No. 48, 2021) involving charges under IPC Sections 302, 451, 452, 148, 149 and Arms Act Sections 25, 27. The court found that all material witnesses except one (who is abroad) had already been examined and none supported the prosecution case; with only 3 of 33 witnesses examined over 5 years of custody, trial conclusion appeared remote. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 2,00,000 FDR deposit, monthly police station appearances, and restrictions on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/48653/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/48653/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Surinder Singh @ Happy @ Gulli in a murder case (FIR No. 48, 2021) involving charges under IPC Sections 302, 451, 452, 148, 149 and Arms Act Sections 25, 27. The court found that all material witnesses except one (who is abroad) had already been examined and none supported the prosecution case; with only 3 of 33 witnesses examined over 5 years of custody, trial conclusion appeared remote. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 2,00,000 FDR deposit, monthly police station appearances, and restrictions on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case