MANJEET SINGH BHATIA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRM-M/47680/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 28-Aug-2025

CNR: PHHC011361492025

Filing Number

CRM-M/71379/2025

Filing Date

25-Aug-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/47680/2025

Registration Date

26-Aug-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJEET SINGH BHATIA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. MOHAN SINGH RANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.RASHMI CHHABRA @ RITA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.RASHMI CHHABRA @ RITA

  4. 4.MOHIT CHHABRA

  5. 5.RAJINDER CHHABRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 0055 against Manjeet Singh Bhatia and another, filed under sections 351(2), 333, 3(5), 118(1), 109(1), 115 BNS, after finding a genuine compromise between the accused-petitioners and the injured complainant Rashmi Chhabra @ Rita dated 10.06.2025. The trial court verified the compromise was voluntary and without coercion, with all parties consenting to the FIR's quashing, following established Supreme Court principles on compromise in criminal cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/47680/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 0055 against Manjeet Singh Bhatia and another, filed under sections 351(2), 333, 3(5), 118(1), 109(1), 115 BNS, after finding a genuine compromise between the accused-petitioners and the injured complainant Rashmi Chhabra @ Rita dated 10.06.2025. The trial court verified the compromise was voluntary and without coercion, with all parties consenting to the FIR's quashing, following established Supreme Court principles on compromise in criminal cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case