PUNARBIR KAUR AAKRITI MITTAL vs KARANDEEP SINGH — TA/1267/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Oct-2024

CNR: PHHC011358152024

e-Filing Number

01-10-2024

Filing Number

TA/57392/2024

Filing Date

03-Oct-2024

Registration No

TA/1267/2024

Registration Date

03-Oct-2024

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNARBIR KAUR AAKRITI MITTAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARANDEEP SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    TA/1267/2024 Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Punarbir Kaur's petition seeking to transfer her husband's Section 12 divorce petition from Patiala Family Court to Jalandhar. The court rejected her claims of hardship (155 km distance, unemployed status, elderly parents) after finding the respondent suffers documented mental health issues requiring parental support, whereas the applicant presented no credible extenuating circumstances. The 2-hour journey frequency was deemed reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/1267/2024

casestatus.in Summary

TA/1267/2024 Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Punarbir Kaur's petition seeking to transfer her husband's Section 12 divorce petition from Patiala Family Court to Jalandhar. The court rejected her claims of hardship (155 km distance, unemployed status, elderly parents) after finding the respondent suffers documented mental health issues requiring parental support, whereas the applicant presented no credible extenuating circumstances. The 2-hour journey frequency was deemed reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case