SIMRANJEET SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/47220/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011357972025

Filing Number

CRM-M/71107/2025

Filing Date

25-Aug-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/47220/2025

Registration Date

25-Aug-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIMRANJEET SINGH

    Adv. KANWALJEET SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/47220/2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted pre-arrest bail to Simranjeet Singh in FIR No. 102 (registered at Police Station Dakha, Ludhiana Rural) for offences under Sections 329(4), 305, 324, 190, and 191(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court allowed the petition after both the petitioner's counsel and the State (through the Investigating Officer) confirmed that the petitioner had already joined the investigation and no further custodial interrogation was required, making the earlier interim order absolute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/47220/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/47220/2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted pre-arrest bail to Simranjeet Singh in FIR No. 102 (registered at Police Station Dakha, Ludhiana Rural) for offences under Sections 329(4), 305, 324, 190, and 191(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court allowed the petition after both the petitioner's counsel and the State (through the Investigating Officer) confirmed that the petitioner had already joined the investigation and no further custodial interrogation was required, making the earlier interim order absolute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case