MOHINDER PAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR — LPA/1387/2017
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011357232017
Filing Number
LPA/1387/2017
Filing Date
25-Jul-2017
Registration No
LPA/1387/2017
Registration Date
31-Jul-2017
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Bench Type
Double
Category
1.13 - LPA COOPERATIVE ( 337 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
LPA SECTION
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHINDER PAL
Adv. AMARDEEP SINGH GILL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Mohinder Pal's appeal challenging orders holding him liable to repay an outstanding loan of Rs. 4.70 lakhs taken in 2001. The court upheld the lower court's decision after examining the original loan application form, which bore Pal's signature as the authorized loanee (with Beena Sehgal as guarantor), finding no evidence of repayment and rejecting his claim of being a "dummy loanee." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Dec-2018
Mr. Justice Mahesh Grover,mr. Justice Lalit Batra
-
06-Dec-2018
—
Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh , Mr. Justice Hari Pal Verma
-
23-Aug-2018
Mr. Justice Mahesh Grover,mr. Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu
-
23-Aug-2018
—
Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh , Mr. Justice Tejinder Singh Dhindsa
-
05-Mar-2018
—
The Taxing Officer , Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi
-
24-Nov-2017
—
Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh , Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal
-
09-Oct-2017
Mr. Justice Mahesh Grover,mr. Justice Raj Shekhar Attri
-
09-Oct-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2017
Case filed
Registration No. LPA/1387/2017
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Mohinder Pal's appeal challenging orders holding him liable to repay an outstanding loan of Rs. 4.70 lakhs taken in 2001. The court upheld the lower court's decision after examining the original loan application form, which bore Pal's signature as the authorized loanee (with Beena Sehgal as guarantor), finding no evidence of repayment and rejecting his claim of being a "dummy loanee." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts