DURGA PRASAD DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CR/5792/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Aug-2025

CNR: PHHC011350522025

Filing Number

CR/52728/2025

Filing Date

22-Aug-2025

Registration No

CR/5792/2025

Registration Date

25-Aug-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Coram

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.15 - LAND ACQUISITION ACT ( 509 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DURGA PRASAD DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND ANOTHER

    Adv. TANMOY GUPTA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.LAC

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.LAC

  4. 4.FC PS (Police Station)

  5. 5.DIRECTOR

  6. 6.MD HSIIDC

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/5792/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the revision petition and held that landowners are entitled to statutory interest from the date of Section 4 notification for 6 kanals 13 marlas of land that was inadvertently omitted from their Section 18 reference petition. The Court reasoned that the Land Acquisition Collector's statutory obligation under Section 19 to provide complete and correct land particulars cannot be circumvented by the landowners' inadvertent omission, and once dissatisfaction is expressed, interest entitlement cannot be denied merely due to incomplete initial pleading. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/5792/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/5792/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the revision petition and held that landowners are entitled to statutory interest from the date of Section 4 notification for 6 kanals 13 marlas of land that was inadvertently omitted from their Section 18 reference petition. The Court reasoned that the Land Acquisition Collector's statutory obligation under Section 19 to provide complete and correct land particulars cannot be circumvented by the landowners' inadvertent omission, and once dissatisfaction is expressed, interest entitlement cannot be denied merely due to incomplete initial pleading. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case